should add I'm not accusing JMO of submitting the incorrect info - more likely some over enthusiastic user of her data - I've also noticed that whilst the extracted entries are extremely accurate quite often when you look in detail at special patron submitted batches it is obvious that children have been transcribed incorrectly (eg baptismal dates transposed etc) - I'm dreading as to what will happen once those inexperienced with decoding handwriting etc of this period start to work on the images of the actual registers.