Hello Philip,

You said,
Looking back to your posting of 1/8/2011, 1:28 a.m., this needs to be changed in the light of your last four postings.

We Agree – it has been changed

In the section that starts JOHN 1647 – 1699, we are still happy that 1687 John Lowny married Margaret Kelvie – not proved yet.

We agree

You said,
but we no longer think that c1666 William Looney married Joney Quillease.

We agree.

Knowing that we both have the CKR trees in front of us, that makes discussion easier.

Yes

As I see it, to move from CKR’s position to yours we have to go to Bwoaillee Losht (2) (thanks for the excellent map extract)

my Pleasure

and detach Margaret Hutchin and her children and the Dreemskerry property from John the son of Robert L and Jane Kneen, and attach them instead to John the son of Margaret Kelvie on Looney Yack (1).

We agree.

The ousted Isabel Camaish and her descendants on Looney Yack (2) join John (1770) the son of Daniel, on Looney Yack (1).

We agree – but not ousted – we are all descendants of, John Looney & Margt. Kelvie

Back on BL (2), John the only son of Robert L and Jane Kneen, having been deprived of his wife and many children, does not long survive.

We agree

Is that it, in a nutshell?

Yes

If so, can you show that that is the true interpretation of the data?

My true interpretation of the data is coming tomorrow

Averil