the 1881 census as quoted by Sue + the extracted baptismal reg - my fault in injecting the Henry (as I said I probably automatically formalised the name as rare to see Harry used outside of an informal context in this period - 19th century IoM + UK would be quite different than 21st century USA in use of names) at that time I hadn't seen the baptismal reg only the census entry and am surprised to see him baptised with that name.