Dear Ms. Jean

Thank your for replying, and I will adddress your comments:

1. The Bible data has been given to Ms. Coakley and I mailed two books to her concerning the history of our family, and I gave her the web site of of our family data, she has had all this data many times.

2. When the Bible is found I will be more than glad to post the page, and e-mail to those who feel so adamant about my ancestors and family are not CAINE'S OFF THE ISLE OF MAN, I have been made a mockery of by MS. Coakley, which I have been quite gracious to paying 50.00 Americian dollars for her CD OF ELECTRONIC COMPENDIUM mailed directly to her post with gracious gifts of teas and antique teacup set, I have forwarded her packages of data, and she has had all the data.

No I have not personally ever seen the BIBLE, but we have living relatives in their 90's one is a lawer and a chemist, and I daresay not one who tell false hoods, and the lawyer is in his 60's, and they have seen the BIBLE and the research for my roots began years and years and years ago. I am sorry that Ms. Coakley feels the way she does about my roots, but our research was done a Long time ago, the problem began when she brought in a MARRIAGE OF ADAM CAINE TO ELENOR STOEN, STEPHAN, which was A MORMON FILE which she emphatically keeps stating to all postees beware of the the MORMON FILES, just recently she stated this again the CORLETT LINE, to a postee, so stated. by Ms. Coakley many times, our Patrick could have never left the Isle, the PARISH RECORDS, some of them are so undiscernable, in such disarray they cannot be transcribed, our data has been posted here many times. I am tired of the fact she has no CREDENTIALS to state our PATRICK did not come from the Isle, she has stated in many e-mails , MAY HAVE, OR COULD BE, NOT FACTS. I HAVE TOLD HER THANK AND OUR E-MAILS HAVE BEEN CORDIAL.

I have been most gracious as stated, but there a line whereby I draw, and the line has been overstepped now to my limits of human emotions. I have been kind to Ms. Coakley and I know AMATUER means just that, that is why I have been waiting on a genealogist to go back and research this marriage of ELEANOR STOEN TO ADAM CAINE that MS. COAKLEY introduced, so I am awaiting her reply for the genealogist was given to me by the MUSEUM, one could not do it and so I have engaged the other when she is finished with other clients, I am still awaiting her reply back.

My dear if your family roots was constantly being attacked as false data, where did get that data and etc, etc, when I have given all this Ms. Coakley in e-mails, and sent data to her post and she still openly humiliates me on this board where the world is the arena, that is quite UNFAIR and UNDIGNIFIED, if she would have e-mailed me privately I could have addressed it perhaps in a different manner, and I do agree she has helped many on this board and she has also discouraged some. AS in the the posting of the CORLETTs who have found themselves to be cousins, and again Ms. Coakley puts out to the postees discouraging data.

You are right, documentation, I am legal and I know all about documentation, the MANX blood in my veins is documented, and I have to prove to NO MAN ON THIS EARTH, where my roots are, the bodies are buried here and I wanted ADAM'S BONES for the very reason of Ms. Coakley's adament attitude, and for diseases of our line and for PATRIICK, and I have been contantly kicked against the pricks.

So MY DEAR you must know I have been mighty gracious and controlled even when being beat against the rocks.

Have a lovely day and I hope I have answered your questions, and If not,AS STATED I DO NOT HAVE TO PROVE TO YOU OR MS. COAKLEY WHO I AM SHARED AS THE BOARD REQUESTED, because in the beginning I was not a sharer, AND I HAVE BEEN CONSTANTLY QUESTIONED AS SOME CRIMINAL ABOUT MY ROOTS.

Kindly yours,

Mrs. Rosa