Ref
|
Date
|
Brief Description
|
---|---|---|
AP_143_1 |
-.-.1822
|
Opinion of Mr.W.Harrison as to the propriety of admitting Mr. W.Roper to practice in Manx Courts. |
AP_143_2 |
-.-.1727
|
Opinion of Att. Gen, (P. Yorke) on the seizure of East India goode in the I.O.M. |
AP_143_3 |
-.-.1629
|
Opinion of the Keys etc.as to the need for tenants of the Abbey lands to pay a fine on renewing their leases. |
AP_143_4 |
-.-.1729
|
Opinion of Att.Gen. (P.Yorke) as to whether Manx boats should pay duty on the grounds that the Islend is part of the Dominion of Gt. Britain. (2 copies) |
AP_143_5 |
-.-.1729
|
Opinion of Att.Gen. (P.Yorke) as to whether certain men employed in the Newfoundland fisheries should pay the above duty - which is for the upkeep of the Royal Hospitel at Greenwich. (2 copies) |
AP_143_6 |
-.-.1780
|
Opinion of Sir J.Scott as to whether certain bounties are payable on red as well as white herrings. |
AP_143_7 |
-.-.1780
|
Opinion of Att.Gen. (A Wedderburn) on the leases granted to Mr. Quayle by the Duke of Atholl. |
AP_143_8 |
-.-.1785
|
Opinion of Mr.Adam as to the Duke of Atholl's rights to the lands of Ballagilley and Hango Hill. |
AP_143_9 |
-.-.1789
|
Opinion of W.Scott & T.Bever as to the rights of the Duke with regard to certain Spirits cast ashore on the Island. |
AP_143_10 |
-.-.1792
|
Opinion of John Cosnahan as to the Duke's right to make Presentations to Church Livings. |
AP_143_11 |
-.-.1808
|
Opinion of W.Alexander,A.Hart & W.Cooke on a Bill brought in by the Manx clergy. |
AP_143_12 |
-.-.1813
|
Opinion of T.Plumer & W.Garrow on an Insolvent Debtors Act for I.O.M. |
AP_143_13 |
-.-.1824
|
Opinion of J.Humphreys on a proposed Grant of Annuity from Lord Glenlyon to the Norwich Ansurance Co. (This does not appear to have any connection with the I.O.M. N.M. ) |
AP_143_14 |
-.-.1790
|
Opinion of R.Graham as to the effect that the sale of the Nunnery would have an its availability as a Bond given for payments due to the Duke from P.J.Heywood,his late Seneschal. ( ? N.M.) |
AP_143_15 |
n.d.
|
Case stated,but without an opinion on it,as to the powers of persons having a commission from the Chancery Court of the I.O.M. to take statemsnts on Oath when the person from whom the statement is taken is in England. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
Any comments, errors or omissions gratefully received
The Editor |