Dear Ms. Coakley,
You e-mailed me by the MANX NOTEBOOK, I shall addres this on the board, you make it whereby I HAVE TO RETURN TO THE BOARD FOR CLARIFICATION OF ADAM CAINE LINE.

Your e- mail of January 18, 2112, 5:00 p.m. states to me:

a couple of recent bits of work whilst continuint my work on deeds on western parishes

(1) NSS May 1778 18- deed of setttlement JOHN QUIGGIN + wife MARGARET CAINE (m1737)- dated 2 Feb 1771: JOHN QUGGIN senr (Selghage + wife MARGRETT als CAINE settle on ELDEST SON + HEIR JOHN QUGGIN half estate except parcel of mortgaged land known as CLASHARD? + dwelling house: and forasmuch WILLIAM QUGGIN another son of JOHN + wife being heir of gfa THOMA CAINE lands by sd THOMAS CAIN'ES will sd JOHN obliges himself not to disturb BROTH WILLIAM QUGGIN : witt JOHN KAIGHIN, JON KAIGHAN;
(note gfa THOMA CAIN- his will 1759 [ full] ; made 6 Oct 1758; BALLALEIJ; DAUTHER JONEY( w/o of JOHN CANELL BALLACHROINK) ; GRANDSON THOAM CANNELL: GRANDCHILDREN, JOHN, MARGARET, WILLIAM, PHILIP, THOMAS, DANIEL& ISABEL QUIGGEN; DAUGHTER MARGARET QUGGIN(W/O) JOHN), JANE, WIFE JANE asl CAINE.

(2) The JOHN CAINE IN KK PATRICK is SON OF WIILLIAN CAINE( of BALLACAINE OLD NAME, KERROW KEYL/KEIL/KEAL to which it reverted on failure of CAINE'S)- 1712 Lib Vas Kerrow Keal the sd WILLIAM IS DEAD& JOHN HIS SON AS HEIR, is entered for the sd rent aleination fine 5s- WILLIAM WILL d Dec 1711; wife JANE (sick); only child, JOHN-ua - FATHER-IN-LAW THOMAS QUIRK; wants wife to see aunt ANNE decently buried; bro-i-law ROBT QUILLIAM;

JOHN HELD ONTO PROPERTY UTIL 1785

Lib Vas Oct 1785- The said JOHN CAINE is dead with issue male and eldest DAUGHTER, with the said RICHARD QUIRK her HUSBAND, are entered for the said premises as rightful HEIR according to Law-fine 2s 6d

John's will- dated May 1783: BALLACAINE; DAUGHTER MARGARET, CATHERINE(intack DALBY MOUNTAIN rent three halfpence0 exex;1787: WILLIAM KEWLEY h/o CATHERINE acts + aLSO FOR LEGACY FROM HER MOTHER ANN CAINE ALS KARRAN.

I am going stop at this section of your e-mail, to now let you how this connects, JOHN CAINE MARRIED ANN KARREN, we had the spelling CARRAN, as stated in our data,

ALSO MARGARET QUGGIN, ADAM AND ANNE'S DAUGHTER, WAS IN ANNE'S CORLETT'S WILL and MARGARET'S, SON WILLIAM, ANNE CORLETT, MAGARET'S MOTHER DIED died in 1738, by our will and the EPISCOPAL WILL.

Even with this, you even more solidify our TREE, not, DEMOLISH, which ARE VERY NAUGHTY AND UNKIND WORDS

I will now finish you e-mail;

and an earlier m/c NSS May 1764 3- dated 18 Feb 1762: RICHARD QUIRK(Rheaby Moar) obo himself: JOHN CAINE( BALLACAINE) obo DAUT MARGARET: all KK PATRICK; to marry within 14 days: CAINE to settle half estate( if JOHN CAIN marriesa second wife and has a son to give 60 )- JOHN CAIN to possess half of REABY MOAR during his life+ another half after death CATHERINE QUIRK als CRAINE m/o RICHARD; witt WILLIAM KILLEY x, WILLIAM QUIRK

Your last line of the e-mail which was not needed as: YOU STATE, which I am forwarding the e-mail to the Museum.
I THINK THIS DEMLOLISHES 2 MORE OF YOUR SUPPOSED TREE-MAYBE PASS IT ON TO YOUR AMERICAN RESEACHER.

Your last comment was not needed, you have demolished nothing, you have given us more of where JOHN CAINE AND MARGARET. lives went throughout their years.

So, at best, you have helped our line. I must admit you are determined to destroy our tree, by the way, IN YOUR CD, ADAM OF CAINES OF KNOCKAN IN BALLAUGH, HAD A DAUGHTER MARRIED MARGARET, BORN 1709-11-14, WE HAVE HER WITH ADAM AND ANNE CORLETT, born November 14, 1709, and in the will of ANNE CORLETT, MARGARET QUGGIN IS HER DAUGHTER, AND GRANDSON WILLIAM.

We knew much about her marriage and now you have given more about her life that we didn't have and our John CAINE, under ADAM CAINE AND ANNE CORLETT, WE HAVE HIM AS THEIR SON, HE MARRIED ANN CARRAN,KARRAN, AND MARGARET MARRIED JOHN QUGGIN UNDER OUR ADAM CAINE AND ANNE CORLETT, and your marriage is the right year, 1737, where we have MARGARET CAINE MARRIED TO JOHNN QUIGGIN IN KK GERMAN OCOTBER 6 1737, we knew little else about her except by the will of her mother ANNE CORLETT,but you have filled in much for us.

So thank you again for your work; but the last statement was not needed and; for an OXFORD SCHOLAR, I would think those types of words would not come from your caliber of education.

Kindly yours.

Mrs. Rosa