called out the original Braddan burial which covers up to 1711 and indeed the entry appaers neatly in sequence 2 years later than the will - however thanks to a note at end of this section of register now know this section is actually a copy made in 1760 from the decayed old register - all copies contain errors and not all original registers are as neat as this copy as I've often seen entries running down the page or inserted between two other entries - thus unless the original 'original decayed register' has somehow survived it is still an open question as to whether the burial reg or will sequence is 'correct'