Thanks everyone for the responses, I have Emily as Amelia, "Emily" must have been a name used by the family...

Ok.. I have anoyjer question if anyone cam help?.. On a number of records I have from Australia there is a child listed as belonging to the Jane and Daniel Quayle family.. This child was born prior to Amelia, approx 4 years earlier. His name is Hugh Quayle , And he was born in Victoria Australia... This child could not be Janes! as she would have been to young... and not in Australia at that time!.. I'm wondering if this was a child relative of Daniels that they took in??... Or possibly was Daniel married previously and had already been to Australia? (If he is Hughs father)?
I thought this was a possibility because of the big age difference between him and Jane? I have seen some records showing the age difference as either 10 years... But up to 13 years... So not sure what is the truth..