Dear Ms. Coakley,

Thank you for responding, I did get into the web site. YOUR CAINE LINE IS OUR CAINE LINE, now I will go back to our line and correlate with your findings, here I go:

YOU HAVE PATRICK MARRIED TO ELEANOR CLAKRE IN BALLAUGH PARISH IN 17370211,

WE HAVE PATRICK MARRIED TO ELINOR CLARKE FEBRUARY 11, 1737 IN KK BALLAUGH PARISH.

We have ELINOR CLARKE BORN IN OCTOBER 3, 1714 IN KK JURBY, DEATH UNKNOWN, WE HAVE SHE WAS THE DAUGHTER OF PAT CLAKRE AND KATH GAWN,the GAWN IS IN YOUR DATA:

YOUR ELEANOR, NOT ELINOR CLARKE DIED 1753, BURIED BALLAUGH 17521217 WHEN NOTED AS W/O OF PATRICK LEAVING A WILL D18 DEC, DAU, JONEY ANN,{? MISREADalice BOTH UA UNCLE DANL CAINE(JURBY), SUPV, PAT MANY CLAIMS,:INV.

THE UNCLE DANIEL CAINE WAS OF JURBY, WHERE OUR ELINOR WAS BORN.

YOU HAVE PATRICK (WOULD APPEARED) TO HAVE MARRIED A SECOND TIME TO ISABEL KELLY IN KK MICHAEL 17530227(THO SHE IS NOT NOTED A WIDOW) NOW I THINK THIS WHERE YOU MAY BE WRONG,

I AM GOING NOW GOING BACK TO OUR PATRICK AND YOUR PATRICK BOTH OF US HAVE HIM MARRIED TO ELEANOR/ELINOR CLARKE, OF JURBY, YOU HAVE HER DECEASED, WE HAD NO RECORD OF HER DEATH, WE DID NOT WHAT HAPPENED. WE SURMISED SHE DIED WHEN COMING TO AMERICA,

YOU HAVE NO MARRIAGE, YOU SAID IT (WOULD APPEAR) HE REMARRIED AN ISABEL KELLY THEN YOU HAVE A PATRICK'S WILL ARCH 1776 BK 2#86 IN AN ARTICLE OF AGREEMENT BTWEEN WLM KELLY BALLAUGH, WM BRIDSON CTOWN H/O ALICE ALS CAIN WHICH MENTIONS AFTER DECEASE OF PATRICK CAIN, FA-IN-LAW WE BRIDSON+MO-IN-LAW ELINOR.

WE HAVE PATRICK CAINE AND ELINOR CLARKE MARRIED FEBRAUARY 11, 1737 IN KK BAL, YOU HAD THE SAME, BALLAUGH PARISH: PATRICK CAINE AND ELINOR CLARKES, CHILDREN: WE HAVE,

PATRICK CAINE JR. BORN JUNE 23 1737 IN KK MICHAEL (BAP DATE) DIED AUGUST 1781 IN AMERICAN REVOUTIONARY WAR.

JOHN CAIN BORN APRIL 04 1739 IN KK PATRICK PARISH, NOW HERE IS WHERE I HAVE FOUND NEW DATA, I WENT BACK , JOHN CAIN WAS A FOSTER CHILD, JOHN WAS POSSIBLEY PATRICK'S NEPHEW, NO RECORD OF FATHER-SON RELATIONSHIP. PATRICK DID HAVE A BROTHER JOHN BORN IN 1703 , THIS JOHN HIS BROTHER, MARRIED ANN CARRAN, WHO COULD HAVE BEEN THIS INDIVIDUALS FATHER.

MARGERET CAIN, BORN 1740 IN KK BALLAUGH,(FOSTER DAUGHTER) FOSTER CHILD, MARGARET IS POSSIBLE SISTER OF JOHN WHO WENT TO LIVE WITH HER UNCLE WHEN THEIR PARENTS DIED, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT PATRICK HAD A DAUGHER NAMED MARGARET.

JONEY CAIN, BORN SEPTEMBER 17, 1740 YOU HAVE THE SAME JONEY BORN BORN ON THE SAME DATE BAP DATE SO THIS OUR PATRICK, NO DOUBT NOW

ELINOR CAIN BORN FEB, 26, 1742

NOW ARE YOU READY FOR THIS:

ALICE CAIN, (EALEE) BORN SEPT 2 1746 IN KK BALLAUGH YOUR RECORD, THE SAME , ALICE BORN ALICE, BAL, 17460902 WHEN NOTED AS IN SCONDLE GILL, SHE (WOULD APPEAR) YOU STATE TO HAVE MARRIED WM BRIDSON.

WE HAVE ALICE, THE EARLIEST RECORD SHOWS HER IN AUGUSTA COUNTY VA. IN LAND RECORDS ON MARCH 11, 1747,ALICE WAS BORN IN 1746,SHE WAS WITH PATRICK, HIS DAUGHTER, IN AMERICA THEN TO WAXHAW SETTLEMENT AND HEALING SPRINGS, MARRIED NATHANIEL WALKER IN 1762 IN WAXHAW SETTLEMENT, THEN IN SOUTH CAROLINA,

THIS IS WHERE THE PROBLEM IS, WE HAVE OUR ADAM WE HAVE OUR PATRICK , YOU HAVE ( WOULD APPEAR) IN TWO OF YOUR FINDINGS, PATRICK( WOULD HAVE APPEARED) TO HAVE REMARRIED, YOU HAVE ALICE (WOULD HAVE APPEARED), TO HAVE MARRIED WM BRIDSON,WELL (WOULD APPEAR) IS NOT ACTUAL DATA, WE HAVE ACTUAL DATA, THAT PATRICK AND ALICE CAME TO AMERICA AND YOU have JONEY AND ALICE AS PATRICKS CHILDREN, AND WE HAVE THEM AS PATRICK'S CHILDREN:

THE WILL SEEMS THE SAME WAY( YOU HAVE FOUND A WILL OF A PATRCK WHO HAS AN ARTICLE OF AGREEMENT) , YOU HAVE JONEY HIS ELDEST DAUGHTER AND HER CHILDREN NEXT ON YOUR LINEAGE, OFF OF THIS PATRICK, I WOULD LIKE A COPY OF HIS WILL, FOR PATRICK AND ALICE CAME TO AMERICA, APPARENTLY JONEY DID NOT LEAVE THE ISLE, ALL OUR FACTS COME TOGETHER UNTL WE GET TO WHEN PATRICK LEFT, HE MARRIED ELINOR CLARKE, HE HAD THE SAME CHILDREN YOU HAVE, IT IS APPARENT MARGARET AND JOHN WERE NOT HIS CHILDREN, FOSTER CHILDREN, I HAD TO GO BACK AND FOUND THIS, BUT THEIR WERE JOHNS, CHILDREN, SO IF ANNE CORLETT WAS MARRIED TO JOHN AND THEIR PATRICK CAME OVER WHERE IS ALICE, THEY HAD NO ALICE,

THE PATRICK IS OUR PATRICK, but he did not marry ISABEL KELLY.

We are both right and both wrong, somewhere, we have our PATRICK OUR ADAM, THE BIBLE IS RIGHT, SO WHAT IS THE MISSING PIECE?????????????????

KINDLY YOURS,

MRS. ROSA

P.S. FORGIVE CAPS, NOT SCREAMING, JUST EASIER TO DO.